Baja.Beaches
In Bloom
I don’t really see a benefit in 192khz sampling rate. I came up in the days of 44.1 vs 48k, and in those days the primary benefit of increasing sampling rate was increased frequency bandwidth from 22khz to 24khz we can’t hear above 22k to start with.
Interesting point.
192 khz vs 96 khz, generates a lot of controversy. I worded it “theoretically” since I do not have a confirmed opinion yet. There is no doubt that 192 captures more info with considerably larger files; but how much of that can we actually hear….
Heck if I know, I haven’t recorded enough to know but I remember bit rates & early mp3s…
You are right, for home use it is probably negligible but I will still choose higher bit rates. Course I tend to overthink things.